To: Dan Hendrick
Subject: RE: 

      Is information just that nothing else,  can information cause
someone to die.  If you put out a site with information that caused
someone to die would you be a murderer.   If you believed something
caused cancer and you caused others to believe it did and it actually
didn't cause cancer.  Would  you be quilty of their death.

     When did you actively study cancer? 

Or did you just read the script from someone else?  Colon Cancer kills
one in 9, tests which check for blood in stool cost $10 for five test
with early detection their is a 90 % cure rate.  Mammography when it
checkes breast cancer early cures 90% of the time one in 9 women get
breast cancer.  If everyone got these tests billions would be lost in
radiation therapy and chemotherapy.   WHY aren't you telling the world
about this. You will not prevent all types of cancer with B-17.   Thanks
to poor medical information my aunt was killed in a slow excrusiatingly
painful process.

http://www.angelfire.com/oh/hickhick/cancercure.html

http://www.datadepo.com/cancercure/b17.htm

http://www.cancertest.com/
Very Inexpensive tests to detect cancer early before it metasisizes  $10
cancer screening tests which can increase a patients survival odds to 90% .

--------

http://www.cancer.org/

      American Cancer Society: Cancer Screening which they feel every
one should take.   Hedge your bets by following there screening
quidelines   which they recommend and encourage readers to pursue
standard inexpensive preventative  Screenings.  

        If you've gotten colon cancer microscopic blood in stool will
show its first symptom.  An entire family of five can be tested for $10.
To imply that no one has gotten cancer who took Vitamin B-17 gives
people a security  which can cause people to use new and proven
preventative measures. 

       IF YOU WANT TO TAKE A VITAMIN THAT IS NOT AN ESSENTIAL VITAMIN
THEIR IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT.   But people should never be lead to
believe that other proven cancer prevention should not be pursued.  If
you later find out it wasn't as effective as you would liked it to be,
for example you yourself get cancer than  you will have been thankful,
that you did also hedge your bets by using every inexpensive method of
prevention. 

       My aunt got breast cancer she ate a vegetarian diet, she exercise
regularly, had good cholestol levels, but she didn't have any children a
risk factor for breast cancer,    also she might have had one of two
genes identified to cause Breast Cancer in a small percentage of woman
which meant nothing would have prevented it except mammography.